生物環境技術研究会
Institute of Biological Environmental Engineering
EN 日本語
Chapter 1
Theory — Principles of Nitrogen Cycling
Systematic classification of nitrogen management in aquariums and explanation of this theory's mechanism

1.1 The Nitrogen Problem in Aquariums

Classification of Nitrogen Management Methods

Methods for processing ammonia (NH₄⁺) generated in aquariums can be systematically classified along a single axis: "export nitrogen outside the system" or "cycle it within." The following tree diagram shows the positioning of each method.

Fish Excretion → NH₄⁺ (Ammonia) Generated
Methods are classified by how they ultimately handle nitrogen
Export
Export
Remove nitrogen from the system
Physical/Chemical
Water Change
Physical removal with water
Physical
ProsReliable, simple, immediate
ConsHeavy labor for large tanks
Adsorbents
Adsorb onto zeolite etc. → replace
Chemical
ProsConvenient, combinable
ConsReplacement cost, finite capacity
Protein Skimmer
Bubbles export organics (saltwater)
Physicochemical
ProsHigh efficiency in saltwater
ConsDoes not work in freshwater
Biological → Gasification
Anaerobic Denitrification
NO₃⁻ → Released to atmosphere as N₂ gas
DSB / Denitrification reactor
ProsComplete nitrogen removal
ConsH₂S risk, fatal on collapse
Biological → Biomass Conversion
Plant Uptake
Plants assimilate N → export via trimming
ADA / Walstad method
ProsExcellent aesthetics
ConsCO₂ injection, high light required
Bacterial Biomass Export
Grow bacteria → export via skimmer etc.
Biopellets etc.
ProsEfficient nitrate removal
ConsSkimmer required (saltwater only)
Cycle
Cycle
Recirculate nitrogen within the system
Photoautotrophic (Light + CO₂)
Green Water Method
Algae photo-assimilate NH₄⁺ → food chain
Outdoor, low load
ProsSelf-sustaining on sunlight alone
ConsWeather dependent, cannot handle high load
Photoheterotrophic (Light + Organics)
PNSB (Purple Non-Sulfur Bacteria)
Assimilate NH₄⁺ with light + organics
Functions in anaerobic + light
ProsHigh-nutrition biomass production
ConsRequires anaerobic environment
Heterotrophic (Organic Carbon)
Holobiont Method
Heterotrophic bacteria directly assimilate NH₄⁺
Benthos prey → food chain cycle
Indoor, high load, practical
ProsNo water change, pH lock, self-sustaining
ConsOF required, initial cloudiness
Chemolithotrophic (H₂S etc.)
Sulfur-Driven
Assimilate N via inorganic oxidation
Theoretical, not yet practical
ProsNo light or carbon needed
ConsH₂S toxic, no implementation

Tap each item to expand details

Note: On the Nitrification Cycle (NH₄⁺ → NO₂⁻ → NO₃⁻)
The nitrification cycle is fundamental to aquariums, protecting livestock by converting highly toxic ammonia into relatively harmless nitrate.
ただし、it only changes the form of nitrogen without altering the total nitrogen in the system. Therefore, it is not classified under "Export" in the tree diagram.

Among these methods, this theory adopts the pathway classified as "Cycle — Heterotrophic (Organic Carbon)." The following sections explain its mechanism step by step.


1.2 Direct Ammonia Assimilation by Heterotrophic Bacteria

The differences between the nitrification pathway in conventional tanks and the carbon assimilation pathway proposed by this theory are shown below.

× Conventional Tank (Nitrification)
NH₄⁺ (Ammonia)
↓ Nitrifiers (Nitrosomonas)
NO₂⁻ → NO₃⁻
Releases H⁺
Continuous pH decline, nitrate accumulation
→ Regular water changes needed
◎ Holobiont Method (Carbon Assimilation)
NH₄⁺ + Carbon source
↓ Heterotrophic bacteria (C:N > 20)
Direct incorporation into bacterial protein
No H⁺ released
Stable pH, zero nitrate
→ No water change needed

1.2.1 C:N Ratio and Assimilation Conditions

Which pathway heterotrophic bacteria operate on is determined by the C:N ratio (carbon to nitrogen ratio) in the environment.

C:N Ratio and Bacterial Operating Mode
🔵 Nitrification Mode
C:N < 20
─ Threshold ─
🟢 Assimilation Mode
C:N > 20
NH₄⁺ → NO₃⁻ (H⁺ released) NH₄⁺ → Bacterial protein

In other words, by adding carbon sources to sufficiently raise the C:N ratio, it becomes possible to switch the ammonia processing pathway from nitrification (oxidation) to assimilation (bacterial incorporation).

1.2.2 Growth Rate Differential — Why Nitrification Is Bypassed

Another condition for this pathway switch is the growth rate differential between heterotrophic bacteria and nitrifiers.

Bacterial Group Generation Time NH₄⁺ Processing Byproducts
Heterotrophic bacteria ~20 min to hours Assimilation (incorporated into bacterial protein) CO₂, bacterial biomass
Nitrifiers (Nitrosomonas etc.) ~12-24 hours Oxidation (NH₄⁺ → NO₂⁻ → NO₃⁻) H⁺ (→ pH decline), NO₃⁻

Under conditions with sufficient carbon sources, heterotrophic bacteria proliferate orders of magnitude faster than nitrifiers and consume available ammonia first. As a result, the nitrification cycle (NH₄⁺ → NO₂⁻ → NO₃⁻) is effectively bypassed.

※ Kinetic premise: Heterotrophic bacteria grow faster than nitrifying bacteria. As long as sufficient carbon sources (C:N ratio ≧ ~5-10) are maintained, ammonia is assimilated before being nitrified. This competitive relationship is the central assumption of this theory.
Direct Assimilation Flow (Summary)
NH₄⁺ (Fish excretion) C:N ratio rises by adding carbon source
Heterotrophic bacteria proliferate Assimilate NH₄⁺ as nitrogen source into bacterial protein (no oxidation)
Zero H⁺ release Cause of pH decline eliminated → pH stabilizes at substrate chemical equilibrium (pH lock)

1.3 Nitrogen Cycling through Detritivorous Organisms

1.3.1 Theoretical Principles

In this section, benthic detritivorous organisms are collectively referred to as benthos. This includes Tubifex worms, Gammarus, loaches, and others, which theoretically fulfill the same role regardless of size.

As described in the previous section, heterotrophic bacteria convert ammonia into bacterial biomass. However, this alone would cause biomass to continuously accumulate. The second pillar of this theory is having benthos consume this biomass, and then having the main tank fish consume the benthos, cycling nitrogen through the food chain.

1.3.2 Circulation Methods — Full-Auto and Manual

The method for returning benthos to the main tank is an implementation choice.

■ Full-Auto Method
BenthosTubifex, Gammarus, etc. (micro species)
TransferContinuous auto-supply via pump
PredatorSmall to medium fish
FeatureNo manual labor, 24h loop operation
■ Manual / Large Pump Method
BenthosLoaches etc. (large species)
TransferManual transfer or large pump
PredatorLarge carnivorous fish
FeatureLarge tanks, periodic management needed

In the system reported in this paper, considering the realistic size of household pumps, a full-auto method using micro-benthos (Tubifex, Gammarus, etc.) was adopted.

1.3.3 Material Cycle Schematic

The overall picture of material cycling between the main tank and sump is shown in the following schematic.

Main Tank (Display)
Fish prey on benthos
Fish grow
Waste and uneaten food generated
Overflow drops water to sump
▼ オーバーフロー落水
Water with waste and uneaten food
▲ 給水ポンプ
Treated water + benthos
■ Carbon Source Extract (keeper doses regularly)
Sump (Main Processing Stage)
Bacteria rapidly proliferate, directly assimilate NH₄⁺
Bacterial biomass accumulates
Benthos consume bacteria, proliferate

This cycle continues autonomously, making water changes unnecessary


1.4 Consequences Derived from Theory

From the above mechanism — direct ammonia assimilation via carbon assimilation + food chain through detritivorous organisms — the following consequences are theoretically derived.

Consequence 1: Zero Feeding
Detritivores proliferating in the sump become food for the main tank fish. In the full-auto method, they are continuously auto-supplied through the pump.
Consequence 2: Zero CO₂
CO₂ is continuously produced as a metabolic byproduct of aerobic heterotrophic bacteria. This quantity may exceed gas loss from overflow splashing and supply sufficient CO₂ for plant photosynthesis.
Consequence 3: Non-Anaerobic Substrate
Detritivorous organisms (benthos etc.) continuously physically agitate the substrate, suppressing substrate anaerobic conditions (hydrogen sulfide generation). This reduces the need for resets.

pH Lock

A noteworthy consequence of this theory is the pH lock phenomenon. Its mechanism is explained by the following causal chain.

pH Lock Causal Chain

① Carbon source addition → C:N ratio rises
② Heterotrophic bacteria directly assimilate NH₄⁺ → Nitrification does not proceed
③ Nitric acid (HNO₃) is not produced → Cause of pH decline eliminated
④ pH stabilizes at the chemical equilibrium point determined by substrate buffering capacity

Importantly, the substrate is not a system prerequisite but a parameter that determines the pH equilibrium point. This theory functions as long as the sump has porous media (bacterial colonization surface), and the main tank can theoretically be a bare tank.

Relationship Between Substrate and Stable pH
Fired Akadama + Peat Moss
pH 5.5〜6.5
Fired Akadama
pH 6.85
Oiso Gravel
pH 7.0
Coral Sand
pH 8.0〜8.4
Acidic 4.0Neutral 7.0Alkaline 9.0